A short account of Sunday! It was a great meeting, and many thanks to Mark and Daniel for organising it, and to Daniel and Lorraine for hosting it.
A few things struck me especially – how much music means to us all, what an endlessly absorbing topic of conversation it can be, but also, how very differently we all view it and what an expression of individuality it is. Several people made the point that music can be both a great unifier and a great divisive force, it’s an expression of identity both individual and group, or tribe, or, as Andrew commented, class. I suppose it’s a language, but it’s also a rich source of all the things we want and need to find in it, emotion, meditation, humour, transcendence, relaxation. It was also interesting to realise that not only ‘Spiritual’ music with a capital S is in fact spiritual to, or resonates with, (as was discussed on Sunday), any one individual. Our spiritual and religious feelings are as wide-ranging as our tastes in music!
I was particularly interested in Daniel’s thoughts about the way sound resonates, and the whole conversation about sound and space, and spaces, as I’d never thought about any of those things before. Mark also played an amazing CD of sounds and tunes and birdcalls on ancient wind instruments – as a wind player himself, (who played beautifully to us on his penny whistle) obviously these instruments are dear to his heart!
I don’t know people well enough yet to be able to say how such and such a piece reflected so and so’s personality, but I liked what Hilde said about identifying with certain words in her ‘Dead Can Dance’ song about making a path for the spirits because that is what she works on in her own shamanic practice. I’d never heard of that band before, though others had. That piece sparked off a conversation in itself about the relationship between music and words, with some of us being more oriented towards one or the other, or vocal or instrumental music in general. All thought-provoking stuff, why this should be, and what the relationship is.
I think it was Daniel who commented, after we’d finished discussing our ‘round’ of chosen pieces, that it felt quite emotionally intense. I suppose it did, but it also felt as if we could have another seedgroup on exactly the same subject another day, and the pieces would have been quite different, ditto the conversation!